Both Inside Higher Ed and WLRN Public Media from South Florida reported in recent weeks on a newly revised version of a textbook for the Introduction to Sociology course that is apparently being mandated for use at some Florida public colleges and universities.

According to IHE, “Compared to the original 669-page textbook, the new version is just 267 pages. Unlike the original, the state-approved version doesn’t include chapters on media and technology, global inequality, race and ethnicity, social stratification, or gender, sex and sexuality. It also scraps a section on the government-led genocide of Native Americans. And while the original uses the word ‘transgender’ 68 times and ‘racism’ 115 times, the former term appears only once in the new textbook and the latter six times.”

The WLRN article adds that, “The state decided to create the new textbook—edited by staff of the Board of Governors alongside a work group of sociologists—after the Board of Governors, which oversees higher education in Florida, determined that all of the books being used for Introduction to Sociology courses violated new academic restrictions imposed by state law.”

The WLRN article quotes Dawn Carr, a sociologist at Florida State University who participated in the state work group, as calling the textbook a “stop-gap solution. … either sociologists sat at the table to help create a new textbook, or colleges and universities across the state would be forced to remove Introduction to Sociology as a core course offered to incoming students.”

ASA Vice President Victor Ray posted an interview on his blog with Florida International University sociologist Zachary Levenson about “state censorship, how faculty are coping (or not), and how the uncertainty around what can be safely taught is designed to put faculty on edge.” (Part 2 of that interview is here.)

Another FIU sociologist, Katie Rainwater, joined Levenson to author a commentary for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, “Florida is replacing free inquiry with political indoctrination.” 

(See a DCSS news item on this topic from February 2024.)

[Updated 2/20/26 with an additional reference; see below the original post]

From The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law:

"Using primarily government sources, this study examines the removal of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measures from federal data collections in the first year of the second Trump administration.

"Hundreds of federal surveys have removed SOGI questions in the last year. Measures of gender identity accounted for the vast majority of removals.
Most removals were made through non-substantive change requests rather than the notice-and-comment process."

See the report online.

In addition, the Movement Advancement Project has issued a report that draws on the Williams Institute research: "The Federal SOGI Data Landscape Under the Second Trump Administration: One Year In Review"

"In just the first year of the second Trump administration, the federal government has taken action to pull back or erase key sources of data about LGBTQ people. These data losses are occurring as the administration aggressively advances an anti-LGBTQ—and particularly anti-transgender—policy agenda. ... This report reviews recent progress in federal LGBTQ data collection, documents the scope and consequences of current demographic data removals and rollbacks, and outlines strategies and resources to promote accountability and responsible data governance in an increasingly hostile federal environment."

DCSS has organized a panel at the Eastern Sociological Society Meeting in Washington, DC:

“Doing Sociology in the DMV in a Shifting Sociopolitical Landscape”

March 5, 2026 | 11 AM | Salon E

Washington Marriott Metro Center (12th and H NW)

This session invites collaborative discussion on the challenges presented by the evolving sociopolitical dynamics that impact both academia, broadly, and the discipline of sociology, specifically. How are sociologists adapting, resisting, innovating, or encountering obstacles in response to these changes?

Panelists:

Kim Blankenship, American U and Center for AIDS Research
Yuki Kato, Georgetown U and DC Food Policy Council
Jennifer Turner, Institute for Women’s Policy Research
Judy Lubin, Center for Urban and Racial Equity (not attending but contributing)
Carolette Norwood, Howard U and DCSS President, Moderator

DCSS is also co-sponsoring an informal happy hour on March 5, together with the Public Sociology Association at GMU:

DC Sociologists Happy Hour at ESS

In collaboration with the DC Sociological Society (DCSS), the Public Sociology Association (PSA) at GMU will be hosting an informal post-conference social hour. Join us on Thursday March 5th, 2026 from 7:00PM-8:30PM at the Jackpot Basement Bar (726 7th Street NW, Washington, DC 20001).

Attendees will be responsible for their own refreshment costs.

Please register in advance. DCSS membership is not required.

Presenting at ESS? Please let us know!

Send an e-mail with the details (name[s] and affiliation, title, date and time, brief description) to dcsociologicalsociety@gmail.com and we will update this news item with a list of DMV presenters.

Information about these notices was provided by IPUMS at the U of Minnesota

[See a related news item: "Data Checkup framework for assessing the health of federal data collections"]

Federal Register Notice: American Community Survey (ACS) and Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS)

The Department of Commerce is gathering comments on proposed changes to the ACS and PRCS through next Tuesday, February 17. The changes include the introduction of an internet self-response option for the PRCS (as is already used in the ACS) and the implementation of modernized race and ethnicity standards. The updated race and ethnicity standards are set under Statistical Policy Directive 15. The Census Bureau provides a page outlining its extensive research on race and ethnicity and its testing to develop the updated standards.

[See also, "Take Action: American Community Survey" from dataindex.us]

Federal Register Notice: MEPS-Household Component (MEPS-HC)

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is accepting comments via the Federal Register through March 2 about changes to the MEPS-HC. The notice references minor changes to question phrasing, a change to the respondent sex question, and the removal of questions about counseling and treatment, birth control, aspirin use, and gender. The notice also reports the discontinuation of two supplements: (1) the Diabetes Care Supplement (DCS), which was fielded annually for 2000-2025 (we do not expect the 2023-2025 data to be released) and (2) the Medical Care Self-Administered Questionnaire (ESAQ), which was slated for a single year of data collection in 2024, with no data yet released. Those interested in these components of the MEPS-HC data for their research may want to respond. If your work is not affected by these changes, you may also use this opportunity to describe the general importance of MEPS-HC data for your research agenda.

Federal Register Notice: Contingent Worker Supplement

The Bureau of Labor Statistics is accepting comments through April 13 via the Federal Register about proposed changes to the Contingent Worker Supplement of the Current Population Survey. The proposed changes will update the collection of digital platform work in the supplement scheduled for July 2026.

From the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Update 2/12/26: The ASA Reimagining-NCES project team is assembling this list of papers, reports, and projects about the value of NCES products and about supporting, restoring, or envisioning NCES and its products or functions to inform our project. Please help us make this list as comprehensive and current as possible.

Original announcement:

"With the support of Lumina Foundation and William T. Grant Foundation, the ASA is launching a project to define a revitalized National Center for Education Statistics that is more efficient and agile. While our primary audience is policymakers in the administration and Congress, we want broad input and discussion for what could be a once-in-a-lifetime discussion. Our goal is to publish recommendations in spring 2026 for discussion and consideration. To inform those recommendations, we are hosting small roundtables with key audiences this fall and winter."

Read "NCES: Perspectives, Insights, and Recommendations from Former Leaders" on the ASA website.

Read the complete announcement and sign up for updates on the ASA website.

"Last week, the dataindex.us team launched the Data Checkup, a comprehensive framework for assessing the health of federal data collections.

"Going beyond simple availability checks, the Data Checkup evaluates datasets across six dimensions of risk, from data quality and statutory context to staffing, funding, and policy pressures. Each dataset is assigned a clear status so users can quickly understand where risks exist, and why.

"Built with input from 30+ data experts, the Data Checkup is designed for researchers, journalists, advocates, litigators, and policymakers who rely on federal data.

"By surfacing risks before data disappears or degrades, the Data Checkup helps protect the data we all depend on."

Explore the framework: dataindex.us/collections

[Ed. note: users of federal data will likely be concerned to see so many key data collections flagged as "high risk."]

Call for a special issue of The British Journal of Sociology
“The New Sociology of Propaganda”

Guest Editors: 
Freeden Blume Oeur (Tufts University, USA)
Fiona Greenland (University of Virginia, USA)

"Propaganda is among the most pervasive and vexing social problems today. In the age of big data and given the tight grip that traditional, social, and new media have on our lives, a crowded field — states, governments, news outlets, civil institutions, and experts — has fought to control, filter, and censor information and its ideological messaging. ... The time is right for social scientific research that updates and advances understanding of propaganda. ... This special issue welcomes sociological research from all subfields and all methodologies, covering any corner of the globe, which bears on questions of modern propaganda. Our hope is that such a special issue will help set the social scientific agenda on propaganda as we enter the second quarter of the 21st century. We encourage empirical articles as well as those more historical in focus and those dedicated to building more theoretical understandings of propaganda."

"If you are interested in submitting a manuscript for this special issue, please send initial information to the Guest Editor, Dr. Freeden Blume Oeur (freeden.blumeoeur@tufts.edu), by Monday, March 16, 2026. By Monday, March 30, 2026 the Guest Editor will let all prospective authors know if they are invited to submit a manuscript for consideration in the special issue."

Read the complete call on the journal website.

"If you rely on federal statistical data in your work--from Census data to BLS employment figures to NCHS health statistics--SSRS wants to hear from you. SSRS is a survey research firm and part of a consortium of partners to create the Emergency Mobilization for Essential Research and Government-Data Equivalents (EMERGE) Initiative. Through a grant from the Knight Foundation and with advisory support from the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) and the Association of Public Data Users (APDU), SSRS is conducting a brief survey (less than 5 minutes) to understand how recent changes to federal statistical agencies have impacted professionals across sectors.

"Why this matters: Recent disruptions at the 13 federal statistical agencies--including staff reductions and budget cuts--are creating potential gaps in the data infrastructure that researchers, policymakers, journalists, state administrators, and business leaders depend on daily.

"Your responses will directly inform the development of the EMERGE Initiative to explore independent solutions for maintaining access to reliable, publicly accessible statistical data."

Take the survey: ssrspanel.com/wix/4/p868434879294.aspx?ORG=1

in a post on the Federal Data Users forum, Mark Mather of the Population Reference Bureau noted:

The Census Bureau is requesting public comment on its 2026 Operational Test in support of the 2030 Census. Three elements of the proposed test seem particularly relevant for federal data users:

• The Operational Test described in the notice is limited to two sites: Spartanburg, SC and Huntsville, AL. This is a narrower scope than earlier Census Bureau planning materials. In July 2024, the Bureau announced six planned 2026 test sites, selected to reflect a wide range of enumeration environments, including Tribal lands and rural areas.
• The notice also proposes testing the use of USPS employees as census enumerators. Under the proposal, U.S. Postal Service staff would conduct in-person census interviews in the same manner as Census Bureau field staff. This represents a notable operational change and raises questions about training, respondent interaction, and whether results from a limited test environment can be generalized nationally.
• The notice specifies that Internet Self-Response (ISR) for the test will be available only in English.

The Federal Register announcement of the comment request is available at this link. The comment period ends March 5, 2026.

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has archived the program page for  the Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE) Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grants, apparently marking an end to this funding, at least for the foreseeable future. (Although the directorate page for the dissertation grants still lists several funding opportunities for specific disciplines, these appear to have been archived.)

The American Anthropological Association sent a letter to Congress on January 21, 2026, urging a restoration of these programs. The Society for Applied Anthropology has also apparently written Congress. The Consortium of Social Science Associations (COSSA) has created an action item to enable social scientists to contact Congress directly, as well. 

This change may be related to NSF's recently announced reorganization and changes to the merit review process for proposals. For more context, see the NSF section of our 2025 resources page and scroll to the bottom of the NSF section. (The 2025 resources page has been archived.)